Linda
09-05-2001, 11:19 PM
i just heard some interesting thinking. I'm not sure who said it, I got it second hand, but it goes like this. During the 19th century, while there were many a war being fought with Indians in the western states, Indians in the eastern states were kind of in the same boat as the Japanese-Americans after Pearl Harbor. They were not trusted and they were resented and they were either herded out of the neighborhood, or lived in fear of being herded away.
But then you had the Cherokee who were commonly understood even by the most ignorant po' white trash, as friendly, "civilized" Indians. So you said you were Cherokee to convey that you were docile and not a threat. The Iroquois didn't have to say it, because they also had a rep as being fairly civilized, and because they had enough numbers and enough of their own turf. It was the small tribes that had collapsed and scattered to the four winds that were vulnerable and who adopted this ploy to help them survive.
So, if anybody comes across this thread who's trying to figure out who their Cherokee grandma was, unless the geography of where she was from is known Cherokee territory, be skeptical, be very skeptical. She probably was not really Cherokee.
But then you had the Cherokee who were commonly understood even by the most ignorant po' white trash, as friendly, "civilized" Indians. So you said you were Cherokee to convey that you were docile and not a threat. The Iroquois didn't have to say it, because they also had a rep as being fairly civilized, and because they had enough numbers and enough of their own turf. It was the small tribes that had collapsed and scattered to the four winds that were vulnerable and who adopted this ploy to help them survive.
So, if anybody comes across this thread who's trying to figure out who their Cherokee grandma was, unless the geography of where she was from is known Cherokee territory, be skeptical, be very skeptical. She probably was not really Cherokee.