Coharie Roy
11-08-2001, 08:59 PM
As preposterous as it might seem, the full blooded child of a pure 100% Indian woman and a pure 100% Indian man, after October, 1705, in the great state of Virginia, that child was deemed legally to be a mulatto.
Unbelievable.
Here's the reference:
Source: Hening, ed., The Statutes at Large, vol. 3, pp. 229-235. October 1705-CHAP. IV. An act declaring who shall not bear office in this country.
.... And for clearing all manner of doubts which hereafter may happen to arise upon the construction of this act, or any other act, who shall be accounted a mulatto, Be it enacted and declared, and it is hereby enacted and declared, That the child of an Indian and the child, grand child, or great grand child, of a negro shall be deemed, accounted, held and taken to be a mulatto.
http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/vcdh/jamestown/slavelink.html
Unbelievable.
Here's the reference:
Source: Hening, ed., The Statutes at Large, vol. 3, pp. 229-235. October 1705-CHAP. IV. An act declaring who shall not bear office in this country.
.... And for clearing all manner of doubts which hereafter may happen to arise upon the construction of this act, or any other act, who shall be accounted a mulatto, Be it enacted and declared, and it is hereby enacted and declared, That the child of an Indian and the child, grand child, or great grand child, of a negro shall be deemed, accounted, held and taken to be a mulatto.
http://jefferson.village.virginia.edu/vcdh/jamestown/slavelink.html